Updates

War and Civilisational Regression: An Overview

War disrupts social cohesion, economic stability, and diplomatic relations that underpin civilisational progress. Historically, conflicts have reversed gains in governance, trade, and cultural exchange. The global economic cost of war reached an estimated $14 trillion in 2022, according to the World Bank, illustrating its extensive damage beyond battlefields. India, given its geopolitical position and civilisational ethos, faces the imperative to adopt a proactive peacemaking role to safeguard regional and global stability.

UPSC Relevance

  • GS Paper 2: International Relations – India's foreign policy, peacekeeping, and constitutional mandates
  • GS Paper 3: Economy – Impact of conflict on trade and defence expenditure
  • Essay: Role of India in global peace and security, constitutional values and strategic interests

Article 51 of the Indian Constitution explicitly mandates the promotion of international peace and security, reflecting India’s foundational commitment to peaceful coexistence. The United Nations Act, 1947 provides the legal framework for India’s participation in UN peacekeeping missions, where India is the largest troop contributor with over 7,000 personnel deployed as of 2024 (UN Peacekeeping Report 2024). Domestically, the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 regulates military engagement, balancing internal security with constitutional safeguards. The Supreme Court’s ruling in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) enshrined peace as part of the Constitution’s basic structure, reinforcing peace as a non-negotiable constitutional value.

Economic Consequences of War and Benefits of Peace

India’s defence budget for 2023-24 stands at approximately ₹5.94 lakh crore (~$80 billion), accounting for 2.15% of GDP (Union Budget 2023-24). This allocation reflects a strategic emphasis on deterrence but also highlights the economic opportunity cost of conflict. Globally, war-related disruptions cost $14 trillion in 2022 (World Bank), affecting supply chains and trade flows. India’s trade with conflict-affected regions such as West Asia exceeds $100 billion annually (Ministry of Commerce, 2023). According to NITI Aayog estimates, peace dividends could enhance India’s GDP growth by 0.5-1% annually, underscoring the economic rationale for peacemaking.

Key Institutions Driving India’s Peace and Security Agenda

  • Ministry of External Affairs (MEA): Formulates foreign policy and leads diplomatic peace initiatives.
  • MEA’s Peacekeeping Division: Coordinates India's substantial contributions to UN peacekeeping missions.
  • Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA): Provides strategic research on security and peace.
  • Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO): Develops defence technology to balance deterrence with diplomacy.
  • NITI Aayog: Advises on economic impacts of conflict and peace policies.
  • United Nations (UN): Multilateral platform for peacekeeping and conflict resolution.

Comparative Analysis: India and Norway’s Peacemaking Approaches

AspectIndiaNorway
Peacemaking FocusPrimarily peacekeeping and strategic deterrenceActive mediation and sustained diplomatic engagement
Institutional MechanismMEA-led with no dedicated peacemaking agencyNorwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs with specialized peacebuilding units
Notable SuccessLargest UN peacekeeping troop contributorColombian peace process mediation, 50% violence reduction post-2016
Economic ImpactPeace dividends estimated at 0.5-1% GDP growth (NITI Aayog)Stabilised regional economies and reduced conflict costs

Critical Gap in India’s Foreign Policy: From Deterrence to Peacemaking

India’s foreign policy prioritizes strategic deterrence and bilateral relations over multilateral peacebuilding frameworks. This approach limits India’s influence in global conflict resolution beyond troop contributions. The absence of a dedicated institutional mechanism for proactive peacemaking and conflict mediation constrains India’s ability to leverage its constitutional mandate under Article 51 and its moral authority as a civilisational state. Enhancing diplomatic engagement and institutional capacity is essential for India to transition from a peacekeeper to a peacemaker.

Significance and Way Forward

  • Institutionalize a dedicated peacemaking agency within MEA to coordinate multilateral mediation efforts.
  • Leverage India’s constitutional mandate (Article 51) and Supreme Court jurisprudence to legitimize and expand peacemaking roles.
  • Integrate economic policy with peace initiatives to harness peace dividends for sustainable growth.
  • Strengthen collaboration with international peacebuilding actors, learning from models like Norway.
  • Balance defence preparedness with proactive diplomacy to reduce conflict risks and promote regional stability.
📝 Prelims Practice
Consider the following statements about India’s constitutional and legal framework related to peace:
  1. Article 51 of the Indian Constitution mandates the promotion of international peace and security.
  2. The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 governs India’s participation in UN peacekeeping missions.
  3. The Kesavananda Bharati case established peace as part of the Constitution’s basic structure.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  • a1 and 2 only
  • b2 and 3 only
  • c1 and 3 only
  • d1, 2 and 3
Answer: (c)
Statement 1 is correct as Article 51 directs the state to promote international peace. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act regulates domestic military operations, not UN peacekeeping. Statement 3 is correct since the Kesavananda Bharati judgment includes peace as part of the basic structure doctrine.
📝 Prelims Practice
Consider the following about India’s role in global peace operations:
  1. India is the largest troop contributor to UN peacekeeping missions as of 2024.
  2. India has a dedicated institutional mechanism for global conflict mediation beyond troop deployment.
  3. India’s trade with West Asia exceeds $100 billion annually, making peace in the region economically critical.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  • a1 and 2 only
  • b2 and 3 only
  • c1 and 3 only
  • d1, 2 and 3
Answer: (c)
Statement 1 is correct as per UN Peacekeeping Report 2024. Statement 2 is incorrect; India lacks a dedicated global conflict mediation agency. Statement 3 is correct based on Ministry of Commerce data.
✍ Mains Practice Question
Critically analyse how war undermines civilisational progress and discuss why India must adopt a proactive peacemaking role in line with its constitutional values and strategic interests. (250 words)
250 Words15 Marks
What constitutional provision mandates India to promote international peace?

Article 51 of the Indian Constitution directs the state to promote international peace and security, reflecting India's commitment to peaceful coexistence.

How does the United Nations Act, 1947 relate to India’s peacekeeping efforts?

The United Nations Act, 1947 provides the legal framework for India's participation in UN peacekeeping missions, enabling troop deployment and cooperation with the UN.

What is the economic impact of war on India’s trade with conflict-prone regions?

India’s trade with West Asia, a conflict-prone region, was $105 billion in 2023. War disrupts these trade flows, causing economic losses and instability.

What role does the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA) play in India’s peace initiatives?

IDSA provides strategic research and policy recommendations on security and peace, informing government decisions on defence and diplomacy.

How has Norway’s peacemaking diplomacy impacted conflict resolution?

Norway’s active mediation, led by its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, contributed to the Colombian peace process, reducing violence by 50% post-2016 (Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre, 2023).

Our Courses

72+ Batches

Our Courses
Contact Us