Religious Policy of Aurangzeb: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

Religious Policy of Aurangzeb has been a subject of intense debate among historians. Unlike his predecessors, particularly Akbar and Jahangir, who promoted religious tolerance and a syncretic culture, Aurangzeb adopted a more orthodox Islamic approach in governance. His policies included the reimposition of jizya, destruction of Hindu temples, restrictions on non-Islamic practices, and enforcement of Islamic laws.

However, it is incorrect to view Religious Policy of Aurangzeb purely as religious fanaticism. Political compulsions, economic challenges, and military necessities shaped many of his decisions. His reign saw continuous rebellions from the Rajputs, Jats, Sikhs, Marathas, and Afghans, leading him to implement policies that would strengthen his authority and maintain control over the empire. Nevertheless, these measures alienated large sections of his subjects and played a role in the eventual decline of the Mughal Empire.

Also Read :

---

Different Historical Views on Religious Policy of Aurangzeb

Aurangzeb as a Religious Bigot

Historians such as Jadunath Sarkar, S.R. Sharma, and A.L. Srivastava argue that Aurangzeb was a religious zealot who sought to impose Islamic supremacy at the cost of Hindu and non-Muslim subjects. His policies of temple destruction, reimposition of jizya, and discrimination in government jobs are cited as evidence of religious intolerance. These scholars believe that Aurangzeb’s actions weakened Hindu-Muslim relations, alienating Rajputs, Marathas, and Sikhs, which led to widespread revolts against Mughal rule.

Religious Policy as a Political and Economic Necessity

Scholars like Shibli Nomani, Zahiruddin Faruki, and Ishtiaq Hussain Qureshi argue that Aurangzeb’s religious policies were not purely ideological but politically expedient. The temple destructions, jizya tax, and restrictions on Hindus were not necessarily rooted in religious zeal but rather strategic moves to consolidate Muslim support, counter powerful Hindu elites, and generate revenue for the empire, which was engaged in continuous wars, particularly in the Deccan.

Balanced and Neutral Perspective

Historians such as Satish Chandra and M. Athar Ali present a mixed perspective, suggesting that Aurangzeb’s policies were a combination of religious orthodoxy, political pragmatism, and economic necessity. While he enforced strict Islamic laws, he employed more Hindu officials than his predecessors, showing contradictions in his policies. His temple grants and selective patronage of Hindu institutions indicate that he was not entirely anti-Hindu, but his inconsistent religious policies led to significant unrest.

---

Key Features of Religious Policy of Aurangzeb

1. Promotion of Islamic Orthodoxy and Sharia Enforcement

Aurangzeb sought to reform the Mughal administration by enforcing Islamic laws and banning practices he deemed un-Islamic. He abolished jharokha darshan, the public appearance of the emperor for divine blessings, considering it a Hindu-influenced tradition that conflicted with Islamic principles. He also appointed Muhtasibs (censors of public morality) to regulate public behavior, banning gambling, alcohol consumption, and prostitution.

Religious processions and festivals such as Holi and Diwali were restricted in certain cities, particularly Ahmedabad, to prevent public disturbances. These measures were intended to project Aurangzeb as a pious Muslim ruler, strengthening his position among orthodox Muslims and Islamic scholars.

2. Destruction of Hindu Temples and Religious Restrictions

Aurangzeb’s temple destruction policy remains one of the most controversial aspects of his rule. In 1670, he ordered the demolition of newly constructed temples across the empire, arguing that they were built in defiance of Mughal authority. Some of the most significant temples destroyed include:

• Vishwanath Temple in Banaras
• Keshav Rai Temple in Mathura
• Somnath Temple in Gujarat

While temple destruction was widespread, historians argue that these actions were politically motivated rather than purely religious. Many temples were centers of regional political power and rebellion, and their destruction was aimed at suppressing resistance. At the same time, Aurangzeb also provided grants to certain Hindu temples, indicating that his policies were not uniformly anti-Hindu.

3. Reimposition of Jizya Tax (1679)

The most direct anti-Hindu measure of Aurangzeb’s reign was the reimposition of the jizya tax in 1679, which had been abolished by Akbar. The tax was structured as follows:

• Wealthy Hindus paid 48 dirhams per year.
• Middle-class Hindus paid 24 dirhams per year.
• Poor Hindus paid 12 dirhams per year.

Women, children, and Brahmins were exempt from jizya. Some historians argue that this was not financially necessary, as jizya generated minimal revenue. Instead, it was a symbolic measure meant to assert Islamic dominance and rally orthodox Muslim support during times of political instability.

4. Restrictions on Non-Muslims in Government Jobs

Aurangzeb imposed restrictions on Hindu participation in government, particularly in revenue administration. In 1671, he issued an order stating that only Muslims could be revenue collectors in khalisa (imperial) lands. However, due to administrative challenges, this policy was later relaxed, and Hindus were allowed to hold certain positions, provided their numbers remained lower than that of Muslims.

Additionally, Hindu traders were taxed at 5%, while Muslim traders paid only 2.5%, furthering economic discrimination.

5. Conflict with Sikhs and Execution of Guru Tegh Bahadur (1675)

In 1675, Guru Tegh Bahadur was arrested and executed after he opposed forced religious conversions in Kashmir. This event led to the militarization of the Sikh community, culminating in the formation of the Khalsa by Guru Gobind Singh in 1699. The Mughal-Sikh conflict escalated, resulting in a long-term struggle for Sikh independence.

---

Impact of Religious Policy of Aurangzeb

1. Increased Revolts and Resistance

Aurangzeb’s religious policies alienated several groups, leading to widespread revolts:

• Rajput rebellion (1679-1681) over Marwar’s annexation.
• Jat uprisings in Agra and Delhi due to excessive taxation.
• Maratha resistance under Shivaji and later Sambhaji, leading to prolonged Deccan wars.
• Sikh rebellion under Guru Gobind Singh, culminating in open conflict in Punjab.

2. Decline of the Mughal Empire

Religious Policy of Aurangzeb weakened Mughal military alliances and strained the empire’s resources. His constant wars in the Deccan drained the treasury, while his alienation of Hindu elites, Rajputs, and Sikhs created power vacuums that regional powers exploited. The Marathas emerged as the dominant power after his death, leading to the fragmentation of the Mughal Empire.

---

Conclusion

The religious policy of Aurangzeb was a complex mix of religious orthodoxy, political strategy, and economic necessity. While he enforced strict Islamic laws and destroyed temples, he also employed Hindu officials and granted temple funds, indicating inconsistencies in his approach. His policies contributed significantly to the empire’s decline, as widespread revolts weakened Mughal authority.

Aurangzeb’s reign remains one of the most debated in Indian history, shaping the political and religious landscape of South Asia for centuries. His policies deepened the divisions between different religious communities, the effects of which can still be seen in modern times.

FAQ