Updates

Discovery of New Butterfly Species in Arunachal Pradesh

In early 2024, researchers from the Zoological Survey of India (ZSI) documented a new butterfly species belonging to the Papilionidae family in Arunachal Pradesh. This species was named after the renowned singer Zubeen Garg, highlighting cultural integration in scientific nomenclature (The Hindu, 2024). Arunachal Pradesh, a northeastern state, hosts nearly 600 butterfly species, accounting for half of India's total butterfly diversity of over 1,200 species (ZSI, 2022). This discovery contributes to the growing inventory of endemic species in the region, emphasizing the state's ecological richness.

UPSC Relevance

  • GS Paper 3: Environment and Ecology – Biodiversity conservation, Wildlife Protection Acts, Role of Institutions
  • GS Paper 1: Geography – Biodiversity hotspots, Northeast India ecology
  • Essay: Conservation challenges and sustainable development in biodiversity-rich regions

Biodiversity Significance of Arunachal Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh covers approximately 7.5% of India's land area but harbors over 50% of the country's butterfly species (ZSI, 2022). Its forest cover stands at 79.33%, the highest among Indian states (Forest Survey of India, 2023). The region's varied topography and climatic conditions create microhabitats conducive to species diversification. However, shifting cultivation (jhum) and expanding infrastructure pose significant threats to butterfly habitats, causing fragmentation and population decline (MoEFCC, 2023).

  • High endemism in butterflies reflects broader biodiversity richness.
  • Butterflies serve as ecological indicators for habitat health.
  • Habitat loss due to anthropogenic activities threatens species survival.

India’s constitutional and legal provisions mandate biodiversity protection. Article 48A directs the state to protect and improve the environment. The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (Sections 6 and 18) regulates biodiversity conservation, sustainable use, and equitable benefit sharing. The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 (amended 2006) offers legal protection to endangered species, though butterflies are generally protected under the Biodiversity Act unless specifically listed. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 recognizes community rights, affecting conservation in biodiversity-rich tribal areas. The National Biodiversity Authority (NBA), established under the Biological Diversity Act, oversees biodiversity management and regulation.

  • Article 48A: Constitutional environmental directive.
  • Biological Diversity Act: Governs documentation, access, and benefit sharing.
  • Wildlife Protection Act: Species-specific protection, primarily for vertebrates.
  • Forest Rights Act: Balances community rights with conservation imperatives.
  • NBA: Regulatory and advisory authority on biodiversity issues.

Institutional Roles in Biodiversity Documentation and Conservation

The Zoological Survey of India (ZSI) conducts faunal surveys and species documentation, critical for identifying new species like the butterfly named after Zubeen. The Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE) researches forest biodiversity and promotes sustainable livelihoods such as butterfly farming. The Arunachal Pradesh Forest Department implements conservation policies locally. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) formulates and enforces environmental laws, while the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) provides research and training in wildlife conservation.

  • ZSI: Taxonomic research and species discovery.
  • ICFRE: Biodiversity research and livelihood promotion.
  • Arunachal Forest Dept: Ground-level conservation enforcement.
  • MoEFCC: Policy and regulatory oversight.
  • WII: Capacity building and scientific research.

Economic Dimensions of Biodiversity Conservation in Northeast India

The Union Budget 2023-24 allocated approximately ₹4,000 crore for environmental and biodiversity initiatives, reflecting increased fiscal prioritization (Union Budget, 2023-24). Northeast India contributes about 7-8% to India’s GDP but supports over 50% of the country’s butterfly species (ZSI, 2022). Ecotourism in Arunachal Pradesh has grown annually by 12% over the last five years, driven largely by biodiversity attractions (Ministry of Tourism, 2023). Butterfly farming and related eco-friendly livelihoods have the potential to generate ₹50-70 lakh annually in local economies (ICFRE, 2023), providing sustainable income sources while incentivizing habitat protection.

  • Significant budgetary allocation for biodiversity conservation.
  • High biodiversity concentration correlates with economic potential.
  • Ecotourism growth linked to butterfly and general biodiversity appeal.
  • Butterfly farming as a model for sustainable livelihoods.

Comparative Analysis: India and Costa Rica on Butterfly Conservation

AspectIndia (Arunachal Pradesh)Costa Rica
Biodiversity Status7.5% land area, >50% butterfly diversity of IndiaGlobal biodiversity hotspot with rich butterfly fauna
Conservation StrategyLacks comprehensive state-level butterfly strategyPayment for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs implemented
Ecotourism Impact12% annual growth in Arunachal Pradesh25% increase in revenue due to PES-driven habitat conservation
Habitat Conservation ResultsThreatened by shifting cultivation and infrastructure30% increase in butterfly habitat over a decade
Community ParticipationLimited integration with conservation and livelihoodsStrong community involvement through PES incentives

Critical Gaps in Arunachal Pradesh’s Butterfly Conservation

Despite rich biodiversity, Arunachal Pradesh lacks a dedicated, comprehensive butterfly conservation strategy that integrates community participation and sustainable livelihoods. This gap leads to underutilization of biodiversity for local economic development and insufficient habitat protection. Existing conservation efforts are fragmented and often do not align with tribal forest rights or local socio-economic realities, limiting effectiveness.

  • Absence of state-level butterfly-specific conservation policy.
  • Weak linkage between biodiversity conservation and tribal livelihoods.
  • Inadequate habitat protection against shifting cultivation and infrastructure projects.
  • Limited community engagement in biodiversity management.

Significance and Way Forward

  • Systematic biodiversity documentation, exemplified by the new species discovery, is essential for informed conservation planning.
  • Integrating biodiversity laws (Biological Diversity Act, Wildlife Protection Act) with tribal rights under the Forest Rights Act is necessary for balanced conservation.
  • State-level butterfly conservation strategy should be developed, incorporating community participation and sustainable livelihood models such as butterfly farming.
  • Adopting Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes, inspired by Costa Rica, can incentivize habitat conservation and boost ecotourism revenue.
  • Strengthening institutional coordination among ZSI, NBA, ICFRE, MoEFCC, and state forest departments will improve policy implementation.
📝 Prelims Practice
Consider the following statements about the Biological Diversity Act, 2002:
  1. It provides for the establishment of the National Biodiversity Authority (NBA).
  2. It offers legal protection to all endangered species including butterflies under Schedule I.
  3. It mandates equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of biological resources.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  • a1 and 2 only
  • b2 and 3 only
  • c1 and 3 only
  • d1, 2 and 3
Answer: (c)
Statement 1 is correct because the Biological Diversity Act established the NBA. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Act does not provide legal protection to all endangered species; species protection is primarily governed by the Wildlife Protection Act. Statement 3 is correct as the Act mandates equitable benefit sharing.
📝 Prelims Practice
Consider the following statements about the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006:
  1. It grants individual and community forest rights to tribal and forest dwelling communities.
  2. It exempts forest rights areas from all environmental regulations.
  3. It impacts biodiversity conservation by recognizing community roles in forest management.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  • a1 and 3 only
  • b2 only
  • c1 and 2 only
  • d1, 2 and 3
Answer: (a)
Statement 1 is correct as the Act grants forest rights. Statement 2 is incorrect; the Act does not exempt forest rights areas from environmental laws. Statement 3 is correct because recognizing community rights influences biodiversity conservation positively.
✍ Mains Practice Question
Discuss the significance of the discovery of new butterfly species in Arunachal Pradesh for biodiversity conservation in Northeast India. Analyse the existing legal and institutional framework governing biodiversity in the region and suggest measures to enhance conservation and sustainable livelihoods.
250 Words15 Marks
What is the significance of naming the new butterfly species after Zubeen Garg?

The naming of the new butterfly species after Zubeen Garg, a prominent cultural figure, symbolizes the integration of local cultural identity with scientific discovery, enhancing public awareness and pride in regional biodiversity (The Hindu, 2024).

Which legal Act governs the equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of biological resources in India?

The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 governs equitable benefit sharing from biological resources, ensuring that local communities and stakeholders receive fair compensation (Sections 6 and 18).

What percentage of India’s butterfly species is found in Arunachal Pradesh?

Arunachal Pradesh hosts approximately 600 butterfly species, which is about 50% of India’s total butterfly diversity of over 1,200 species (ZSI, 2022).

How does the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers Act, 2006, affect biodiversity conservation?

The Act recognizes forest rights of tribal communities, enabling their participation in forest management and biodiversity conservation while balancing ecological protection with community livelihoods.

What lessons can India learn from Costa Rica regarding butterfly habitat conservation?

Costa Rica’s implementation of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs led to a 30% increase in butterfly habitats and a 25% rise in ecotourism revenue, demonstrating the effectiveness of incentivizing habitat conservation and community participation (Costa Rica Ministry of Environment, 2022).

Our Courses

72+ Batches

Our Courses
Contact Us