Updates

Introduction to PM-KUSUM and Battery Storage Proposal

The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) is considering the inclusion of battery storage systems under the revamped PM-KUSUM 2.0 scheme, aimed at augmenting solar energy reliability and farmer income diversification. Launched in 2019, PM-KUSUM targets installation of 10,000 MW solar pumps and 20,000 MW decentralized solar plants by 2022-23 (MNRE, 2020). The addition of battery storage is expected to address solar intermittency and improve grid stability, critical for India’s renewable energy goals and rural electrification.

UPSC Relevance

  • GS Paper 2: Governance – Renewable energy policies, Electricity Act provisions
  • GS Paper 3: Environment – Renewable energy integration, energy storage technologies
  • Essay: Energy security, rural development, and sustainable agriculture

The Electricity Act, 2003 empowers the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) and State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs) under Sections 61 and 86 to promote renewable energy and regulate tariffs. The Energy Conservation Act, 2001 supports energy efficiency initiatives, complementing renewable integration efforts. The National Electricity Policy (2005) mandates grid stability and renewable integration, providing a policy basis for battery storage inclusion under MNRE’s PM-KUSUM guidelines.

  • Section 61 of Electricity Act: CERC’s role in tariff regulation for renewable sources
  • Section 86(1)(e): SERCs to promote cogeneration and renewable energy
  • Energy Conservation Act: Encourages energy-efficient technologies, including storage
  • MNRE guidelines: Framework for decentralized solar and potential storage inclusion

Economic Dimensions of Battery Storage in PM-KUSUM

The PM-KUSUM scheme’s budgetary allocation stands at ₹34,422 crore (MNRE, 2020). Integrating battery storage could increase investment costs by 20-30%, reflecting current technology prices. India targets 500 GW renewable capacity by 2030 (NITI Aayog, 2023), necessitating storage to mitigate solar power intermittency and grid curtailment losses, which the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) estimates at 10-15% annually for solar energy. Battery storage could enhance farmer income by 20-25% through improved energy management and surplus power sales (MNRE impact assessment, 2023).

  • Battery storage market projected at $2.5 billion by 2027 (IEA, 2023)
  • Global battery costs declined 85% since 2010 (IEA, 2023)
  • Storage enables 4-6 hours of solar backup, improving dispatchability (CEA, 2023)
  • Solar capacity reached 64 GW as of March 2024 (MNRE monthly report)

Institutional Roles in PM-KUSUM and Storage Integration

Implementation of PM-KUSUM and battery storage involves multiple institutions. The MNRE formulates policies and oversees scheme execution. The CEA sets technical standards and ensures grid integration. CERC regulates tariffs and incentivizes renewable adoption. State Nodal Agencies (SNAs) coordinate state-level implementation. The India Energy Storage Alliance (IESA) advocates industry interests and promotes storage technologies.

  • MNRE: Policy formulation, scheme funding and monitoring
  • CEA: Grid codes, technical standards for storage integration
  • CERC: Tariff design and regulatory framework for storage
  • SNAs: State-level coordination and beneficiary identification
  • IESA: Industry collaboration and technology dissemination

Comparative Analysis: India vs United States on Solar-Plus-Storage Incentives

AspectIndia (PM-KUSUM 2.0)United States (Federal ITC)
Policy FrameworkScheme-based with limited storage-specific incentivesFederal Investment Tax Credit supports solar-plus-storage projects
Financial MechanismNo dedicated financial mechanism for battery storage yet30% tax credit reduces upfront costs for storage integration
Adoption ImpactSlow adoption due to unclear tariff and incentives50% increase in solar storage adoption (2018-2023)
Grid BenefitsPotential for improved dispatchability and reduced curtailmentEnhanced grid resilience and peak demand reduction

Critical Gaps in PM-KUSUM 2.0 Battery Storage Integration

Despite the proposal, PM-KUSUM 2.0 currently lacks a dedicated financial mechanism and clear tariff structure for battery storage. This regulatory gap slows adoption and underutilizes storage potential. In contrast, countries like the US and Australia have integrated policy and market incentives, enabling faster deployment and grid benefits. Addressing these gaps is essential to leverage storage’s full potential in India’s renewable energy transition.

  • Absence of storage-specific tariffs and incentives in current PM-KUSUM 2.0
  • Limited awareness and capacity at state-level implementation agencies
  • Technology cost and financing barriers for small farmers
  • Need for regulatory clarity on grid integration and dispatch rights

Significance and Way Forward

Integrating battery storage under PM-KUSUM 2.0 can significantly enhance solar power reliability, reduce grid curtailment, and increase farmer incomes by enabling energy sale flexibility. Policy must establish dedicated financial mechanisms, tariff structures, and capacity-building at state agencies. Learning from international models like the US ITC can accelerate adoption. This integration aligns with India’s 2030 renewable targets and rural development goals.

  • Introduce storage-specific subsidies or tax incentives within PM-KUSUM
  • Develop clear tariff frameworks for energy storage dispatch and sale
  • Strengthen SNAs’ capacity for technical and financial support
  • Promote public-private partnerships to reduce technology costs
📝 Prelims Practice
Consider the following statements about PM-KUSUM and battery storage integration:
  1. PM-KUSUM Phase 1 targets 10,000 MW solar pumps and 20,000 MW decentralized solar plants.
  2. The Electricity Act, 2003, does not empower SERCs to promote renewable energy.
  3. Battery storage addition can provide 4-6 hours of solar power backup under PM-KUSUM.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  • a1 and 2 only
  • b2 and 3 only
  • c1 and 3 only
  • d1, 2 and 3
Answer: (c)
Statement 1 is correct as per MNRE 2020 targets. Statement 2 is incorrect because Section 86(1)(e) of the Electricity Act empowers SERCs to promote renewable energy. Statement 3 is correct based on CEA 2023 data on battery storage backup.
📝 Prelims Practice
Consider the following about the US Federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC) for solar-plus-storage projects:
  1. ITC provides a 30% tax credit for solar energy systems including battery storage.
  2. ITC has led to a 50% increase in solar storage adoption between 2018-2023.
  3. ITC mandates that all battery storage systems must be grid-connected.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  • a1 and 2 only
  • b2 and 3 only
  • c1 and 3 only
  • d1, 2 and 3
Answer: (a)
Statement 1 is correct as ITC provides a 30% credit including storage. Statement 2 is correct per US EIA 2023 data. Statement 3 is incorrect; ITC does not mandate grid connection for all battery storage.
✍ Mains Practice Question
Discuss the significance of integrating battery storage systems under the revamped PM-KUSUM 2.0 scheme. How can this integration address challenges in renewable energy deployment and improve farmer livelihoods? (250 words)
250 Words15 Marks
What is the primary objective of the PM-KUSUM scheme?

PM-KUSUM aims to promote solar energy use in agriculture by installing 10,000 MW solar pumps and 20,000 MW decentralized solar plants, enhancing farmer income and reducing dependence on grid electricity (MNRE, 2020).

Which legal provisions empower regulatory commissions to promote renewable energy?

Sections 61 and 86(1)(e) of the Electricity Act, 2003 empower the CERC and SERCs respectively to promote renewable energy and regulate tariffs.

How does battery storage improve solar power utilization under PM-KUSUM?

Battery storage enables 4-6 hours of backup, reducing solar intermittency and grid curtailment losses estimated at 10-15%, thus improving dispatchability and farmer income (CEA, 2023; MNRE impact assessment, 2023).

What are the main institutional actors in PM-KUSUM implementation?

Key actors include MNRE (policy and funding), CEA (technical standards), CERC (tariff regulation), State Nodal Agencies (implementation), and IESA (industry advocacy).

Why is the US Federal ITC considered a model for India’s battery storage incentives?

The US ITC offers a 30% tax credit for solar-plus-storage projects, resulting in a 50% increase in adoption and improved grid resilience, providing a replicable incentive framework for India.

Our Courses

72+ Batches

Our Courses
Contact Us