Updates

In January 2024, India signed defence contracts worth ₹858 crore with Russian and U.S. firms, marking a significant step in its defence procurement strategy. These deals, involving key suppliers Rosoboronexport from Russia and American defence contractors under the aegis of the U.S. Department of Defense, aim to enhance India’s operational capabilities while balancing geopolitical dependencies. The agreements reflect India’s ongoing effort to diversify its defence procurement sources beyond traditional suppliers, aligning with the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2020 framework.

UPSC Relevance

  • GS Paper 2: International Relations – India-Russia and India-U.S. defence ties
  • GS Paper 3: Defence – Defence procurement policies, Make in India initiative
  • Essay: Strategic autonomy and defence diplomacy in India’s foreign policy

India’s defence acquisitions are regulated primarily by the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2020, which standardizes procurement processes to ensure transparency and promote indigenous manufacturing. Article 246 and Entry 54 of the Union List empower Parliament to legislate on defence matters, providing constitutional backing for central control over defence procurement. The Defence Production Act, 1950 facilitates indigenous defence manufacturing by regulating production and licensing, while the Arms Act, 1959 (Sections 3-5) governs arms import and licensing controls.

  • MoD (Ministry of Defence): Formulates procurement policy and oversees contract execution.
  • DRDO (Defence Research and Development Organisation): Develops indigenous technologies and integrates them into procurement.
  • DPSUs (Defence Public Sector Undertakings): Manufacture defence equipment and collaborate with foreign firms.
  • Rosoboronexport: Russian state agency for defence exports, key supplier to India.
  • US DoD (United States Department of Defense): Facilitates bilateral defence deals and technology transfers.

Economic Dimensions of the ₹858-Crore Defence Deals

The ₹858-crore contracts (~USD 110 million) contribute to India’s substantial defence budget of ₹5.94 lakh crore for FY 2023-24. According to the SIPRI Arms Transfers Database (2023), India was the world’s largest arms importer between 2018-22, with imports totaling $13.8 billion. Russia accounted for 45% and the U.S. 25% of these imports in 2022, underscoring their centrality in India’s defence supply chain. The deals also align with the Make in India initiative, involving Indian subsidiaries of foreign firms to boost indigenous production and technology absorption.

  • Estimated employment generation: 2,000 direct jobs per ₹100 crore investment in defence manufacturing (MoD report 2022).
  • Defence exports from India reached $1.5 billion in 2023, growing 20% year-on-year, indicating rising indigenous capability.
  • Make in India aims to increase indigenous defence production to 70% by 2030.

Strategic Implications of Diversified Defence Procurement

India’s simultaneous procurement from Russia and the U.S. reflects a calibrated approach to reduce overdependence on any single supplier, thereby enhancing strategic autonomy. Russia remains a critical partner due to legacy systems and technology compatibility, while U.S. deals bring advanced technologies and interoperability with Western systems. This diversification mitigates risks from geopolitical volatility and sanctions, as witnessed during the Ukraine conflict and U.S. CAATSA sanctions framework.

  • Maintains operational readiness by upgrading platforms with complementary technologies.
  • Balances geopolitical relations, leveraging defence ties as diplomatic tools.
  • Facilitates technology transfer and joint ventures under DPP 2020’s ‘Make’ and ‘Buy & Make’ categories.

Comparative Analysis: India vs China Defence Procurement Strategies

AspectIndiaChina
Defence Budget (2023)₹5.94 lakh crore (~$80 billion)$293 billion
Indigenous Defence Production~30% (aiming for 70% by 2030)>90%
Primary Defence SuppliersRussia (45%), U.S. (25%), OthersPredominantly domestic
Strategic AutonomyModerate, reliant on foreign tech importsHigh, due to integrated state-led innovation
Technology TransferLimited, ongoing challengesRobust, supported by state policies

Critical Gaps in India’s Defence Procurement Ecosystem

Despite policy initiatives, India continues to depend on foreign suppliers for critical technologies, reflecting gaps in commercializing indigenous R&D and effective technology transfer. The fragmented innovation ecosystem and bureaucratic hurdles impede rapid absorption of advanced technologies. In contrast, China’s integrated state-led innovation system has enabled seamless transitions from R&D to production, reducing foreign dependency and enhancing strategic autonomy.

  • DRDO’s technology commercialization remains limited due to lack of industry linkages.
  • DPSUs face challenges in adopting cutting-edge technologies and scaling production.
  • Private sector participation is growing but constrained by regulatory and financial bottlenecks.

Significance and Way Forward

  • India’s ₹858-crore deals with Russian and U.S. firms exemplify pragmatic diversification to maintain operational edge and geopolitical balance.
  • Strengthening indigenous R&D commercialization and incentivizing private sector participation are critical to reducing import dependence.
  • Enhancing technology transfer agreements and joint ventures under DPP 2020 will accelerate Make in India goals.
  • Institutional reforms to streamline procurement and promote innovation ecosystems can bridge existing gaps.
  • Strategic partnerships should be leveraged to gain access to emerging technologies like AI, hypersonics, and cyber defence.
📝 Prelims Practice
Consider the following statements about India’s defence procurement:
  1. The Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2020 governs all defence acquisitions in India.
  2. Article 246 and Entry 54 of the Union List empower States to legislate on defence production.
  3. The Defence Production Act, 1950 regulates indigenous defence manufacturing.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  • a1 and 2 only
  • b2 and 3 only
  • c1 and 3 only
  • d1, 2 and 3
Answer: (c)
Statement 1 is correct as DPP 2020 governs defence procurement. Statement 2 is incorrect because Article 246 and Entry 54 of the Union List empower Parliament, not States, to legislate on defence. Statement 3 is correct as the Defence Production Act, 1950 regulates indigenous defence manufacturing.
📝 Prelims Practice
Consider the following regarding India’s defence imports:
  1. Russia accounted for 45% of India’s defence imports in 2022.
  2. The United States accounted for 25% of India’s defence imports in 2022.
  3. India is the second-largest arms importer globally between 2018-2022.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  • a1 and 2 only
  • b2 and 3 only
  • c1 and 3 only
  • d1, 2 and 3
Answer: (a)
Statements 1 and 2 are correct as per SIPRI 2023 data. Statement 3 is incorrect because India was the largest arms importer globally between 2018-2022.
✍ Mains Practice Question
Analyse the strategic and economic implications of India’s recent ₹858-crore defence deals with Russian and U.S. firms. Discuss how these deals reflect India’s defence procurement diversification and the challenges in achieving self-reliance.
250 Words15 Marks
What is the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2020?

DPP 2020 is the current framework governing India’s defence acquisitions, emphasizing transparency, indigenization, and streamlined procurement processes. It includes categories like ‘Buy Indian’, ‘Buy & Make Indian’, and ‘Make’ to promote domestic manufacturing.

Which institutions are key in India’s defence procurement and production?

The Ministry of Defence formulates policy; DRDO develops indigenous technologies; DPSUs manufacture defence equipment; Rosoboronexport and the US DoD are major foreign partners in procurement.

How significant is India’s defence import dependence?

India imported $13.8 billion worth of defence equipment between 2018-22, making it the world’s largest arms importer. Russia and the U.S. are the primary suppliers, accounting for 45% and 25% respectively in 2022.

What are the economic benefits of defence manufacturing under Make in India?

Make in India aims to increase indigenous defence production to 70% by 2030, generating approximately 2,000 direct jobs per ₹100 crore investment and boosting defence exports, which reached $1.5 billion in 2023.

How does India’s defence procurement strategy compare with China’s?

India relies on diversified foreign suppliers with about 30% indigenous production, while China achieves over 90% domestic content, resulting in higher strategic autonomy and lower foreign dependency.

Our Courses

72+ Batches

Our Courses
Contact Us