Updates

India Withdraws Bid to Host 2028 Climate Summit: Overview

In April 2024, India officially withdrew its bid to host the 2028 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP). The decision was communicated by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), citing a strategic recalibration to balance domestic developmental priorities with international climate diplomacy. India had previously demonstrated active engagement in global climate governance, notably through its commitments under the Paris Agreement 2015 and ambitious renewable energy targets. This withdrawal marks a significant shift in India’s approach to hosting major climate summits, reflecting evolving priorities amid economic and environmental challenges.

UPSC Relevance

  • GS Paper 3: Environment - International environmental agreements, climate change, and India’s climate policies
  • GS Paper 2: International Relations - India’s role in global climate governance and diplomacy
  • Essay: Balancing development and environmental sustainability in India’s climate strategy

India’s climate policy operates within a robust legal and constitutional framework. Section 3 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 empowers the Central Government to take measures for environmental protection and improvement. Article 48A of the Constitution mandates the State to protect and improve the environment as a Directive Principle. The National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) 2008 outlines India’s domestic climate strategy, focusing on eight missions including solar energy and sustainable habitat. Internationally, India is bound by the Paris Agreement 2015 under the UNFCCC, committing to reduce carbon intensity by 45% by 2030 and achieve 500 GW of non-fossil fuel capacity.

  • Environment Protection Act, 1986: Section 3 authorizes Central Government interventions for environmental safeguards.
  • Article 48A: Directive Principle emphasizing environmental protection as a state responsibility.
  • NAPCC 2008: Framework for climate mitigation and adaptation missions.
  • Paris Agreement 2015: India’s NDCs include 45% carbon intensity reduction by 2030 and 500 GW non-fossil capacity.

Economic Considerations Behind the Withdrawal

Hosting a COP summit entails substantial financial commitments. According to UNFCCC financial reports (2018-2022), average hosting costs range between USD 20 million and 50 million, with the UK’s COP26 costing approximately GBP 20 million (~USD 27 million). India’s climate finance allocation under NAPCC stands at INR 1.2 lakh crore (~USD 16 billion) till 2030, aimed at domestic mitigation efforts. The opportunity cost includes potential diversion of funds from critical infrastructure and social sectors. Meanwhile, India’s renewable energy sector attracted USD 20 billion in investments in 2023 (IEA, 2024), and the GDP growth rate is projected at 6.5% for 2024-25 (Economic Survey 2024), underscoring the need to prioritize economic growth alongside climate action.

  • Estimated COP hosting cost: USD 20-50 million (UNFCCC reports).
  • India’s climate finance allocation under NAPCC: INR 1.2 lakh crore (~USD 16 billion) till 2030.
  • Renewable energy investments in 2023: USD 20 billion (IEA, 2024).
  • GDP growth projection 2024-25: 6.5% (Economic Survey 2024).

Institutional Landscape of India’s Climate Governance

India’s climate action is coordinated through multiple institutions. The MoEFCC formulates policy and represents India in international forums. NITI Aayog plays a key role in integrating climate strategies with economic planning. The CPCB monitors environmental standards domestically, while the IPCC provides scientific assessments that inform India’s policy decisions. Globally, the UNFCCC remains the primary multilateral platform for climate negotiations, where India has been an active participant.

  • MoEFCC: Central nodal ministry for environment and climate policy.
  • NITI Aayog: Coordinates climate action strategy and policy integration.
  • CPCB: Enforces environmental standards and pollution control.
  • IPCC: Scientific advisory body influencing India’s climate commitments.
  • UNFCCC: Global climate governance framework under which COP summits occur.

India’s Climate Performance Metrics and Commitments

India’s per capita CO2 emissions stood at 1.9 tonnes in 2022 (World Bank), significantly below the global average of 4.7 tonnes. Renewable energy capacity reached 175 GW as of March 2024 (MNRE Annual Report 2024), progressing towards the 2030 target of 500 GW non-fossil fuel capacity pledged at COP26. The country’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) include a 45% reduction in carbon intensity by 2030 (UNFCCC, 2021). However, NITI Aayog estimates India’s climate finance requirement at USD 2.5 trillion by 2030, highlighting the scale of investment needed.

  • Per capita CO2 emissions: 1.9 tonnes (India) vs 4.7 tonnes (global average), World Bank 2022.
  • Renewable energy capacity: 175 GW as of March 2024 (MNRE Annual Report).
  • Non-fossil fuel capacity target: 500 GW by 2030 (COP26 pledge).
  • NDC target: 45% reduction in carbon intensity by 2030 (UNFCCC, 2021).
  • Climate finance requirement: USD 2.5 trillion by 2030 (NITI Aayog, 2023).

Comparative Analysis: India, UK, and China in Hosting Climate Summits

AspectIndiaUnited KingdomChina
Summit HostedWithdrew bid for COP 2028COP26 in 2021COP15 on Biodiversity in 2021
Hosting CostEstimated USD 20-50 million; withdrew citing costsGBP 20 million (~USD 27 million)Not publicly disclosed; significant investment
Strategic UseFocus on domestic priorities, less emphasis on summit visibilityBoosted green investments and global leadershipLeveraged summit for geopolitical influence and green agenda
Climate Diplomacy ImpactMissed opportunity for enhanced foreign direct investment and technology transferStrengthened international climate partnershipsEnhanced global environmental governance role

Critical Gap in India’s Climate Diplomacy

India’s withdrawal exposes a gap in leveraging summit hosting as a tool for sustained international visibility and climate finance mobilization. Hosting major summits can catalyse foreign direct investment, technology transfer, and capacity building, which India’s current approach underutilizes. Integrating summit hosting with long-term climate finance frameworks and diplomatic engagement could strengthen India’s global climate leadership and domestic climate action simultaneously.

Significance and Way Forward

  • India must balance fiscal prudence with strategic climate diplomacy to avoid losing global influence.
  • Enhancing institutional capacity to host international events can unlock co-benefits in technology and finance.
  • Aligning summit hosting with India’s NDCs and economic growth targets will improve coherence in policy implementation.
  • Public-private partnerships could reduce hosting costs and increase stakeholder engagement.
  • Strengthening international collaboration through forums like UNFCCC remains essential despite withdrawal.
📝 Prelims Practice
Consider the following statements about India’s climate summit hosting and international climate governance:
  1. India withdrew its bid to host COP28 in 2028 due to economic and strategic reasons.
  2. The Paris Agreement mandates India to achieve net-zero emissions by 2030.
  3. The National Action Plan on Climate Change was launched in 2008 to guide India’s climate policy.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  • a1 and 2 only
  • b2 and 3 only
  • c1 and 3 only
  • d1, 2 and 3
Answer: (c)
Statement 1 is correct as India withdrew its 2028 COP bid citing strategic and economic reasons. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Paris Agreement does not mandate net-zero by 2030 for India; India’s NDC targets carbon intensity reduction by 2030, with net-zero targeted for 2070. Statement 3 is correct; NAPCC was launched in 2008.
📝 Prelims Practice
Consider the following about COP summits and climate finance:
  1. Hosting COP summits typically costs between USD 20 million and 50 million.
  2. India’s climate finance requirement till 2030 is estimated at USD 2.5 trillion.
  3. Hosting COP summits is a mandatory obligation under the UNFCCC for all member countries.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

  • a1 and 2 only
  • b2 and 3 only
  • c1 and 3 only
  • d1, 2 and 3
Answer: (a)
Statements 1 and 2 are correct based on UNFCCC financial reports and NITI Aayog estimates. Statement 3 is incorrect; hosting COP summits is not mandatory for all UNFCCC members but decided by consensus and bids.
✍ Mains Practice Question
Critically analyze the implications of India’s withdrawal from hosting the 2028 climate summit on its international climate diplomacy and domestic climate action. (250 words)
250 Words15 Marks

Jharkhand & JPSC Relevance

  • JPSC Paper: Paper 2 (Environment and Ecology), Paper 3 (Economic Development)
  • Jharkhand Angle: Jharkhand’s rich mineral resources and forest cover make climate policies critical for sustainable development and pollution control in the state.
  • Mains Pointer: Frame answers highlighting the balance between industrial growth and environmental sustainability in Jharkhand, linking national climate policy shifts to local impact.
Why did India withdraw its bid to host the 2028 climate summit?

India withdrew its bid citing a strategic recalibration to prioritize domestic developmental needs and economic considerations, including the high costs of hosting and the opportunity cost of diverting funds from infrastructure and social sectors.

What are India’s key climate commitments under the Paris Agreement?

India committed to reducing carbon intensity by 45% by 2030 from 2005 levels and achieving 500 GW of non-fossil fuel energy capacity by 2030 as part of its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement.

How does India’s per capita CO2 emission compare globally?

India’s per capita CO2 emissions were 1.9 tonnes in 2022, significantly lower than the global average of 4.7 tonnes, reflecting its developing economy status and lower historical emissions.

What is the estimated cost range for hosting COP summits?

Hosting COP summits typically costs between USD 20 million and 50 million, depending on the host country’s infrastructure and scale of the event, as per UNFCCC financial reports.

Which Indian institutions coordinate climate action and policy?

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), NITI Aayog, Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), and scientific input from the IPCC coordinate India’s climate action and policy formulation.

Our Courses

72+ Batches

Our Courses
Contact Us