First State/UTs Engagement Workshop Under the National One Health Mission

First State/UTs Engagement Workshop under the National One Health Mission: Strengthening Integrated Health Systems for Human, Animal, and Ecosystem Welfare

Analytical Thesis: Integrating Health through One Health Mission

The **National One Health Mission (NOHM)** is framed around the interdependent relationship between human, animal, and environmental health, aiming to build integrated systems for early disease detection, prevention, and preparedness. This workshop, chaired by the Principal Scientific Adviser (PSA), represents an important step toward translating the "One Health" approach into decentralized, actionable measures. It balances **preventive health systems strengthening** (syndromic surveillance, risk reduction) with real-time technological integration, aligning it with global frameworks like the **WHO's One Health Quadripartite Agreement**.

UPSC Relevance Snapshot

• GS-II: Governance (coordination among sectors, inter-ministerial collaboration), Health (policy interventions, zoonosis).
• GS-III: Science & Technology (surveillance platforms, data integration), Environment (ecosystems and biodiversity).
• Essay: Themes on "Health Systems Resilience," "Humans and Nature: Interdependence in Public Health."

Key Concepts: Understanding the One Health Approach

The **One Health Approach** emphasizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and ecosystem health, recognizing that zoonotic diseases, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and biodiversity loss demand integrated governance. This paradigm underscores **horizontal system strengthening** over vertical silos.

Core Characteristics of One Health

• Integrated Health Risk Surveillance: Surveillance systems that monitor humans, livestock, wildlife, and environmental changes in tandem.
• Real-Time Coordination: Inter-ministerial data sharing between health, agriculture, and environment ministries.
• Ecosystem-Focused Resilience: Holistic risk frameworks aligning with **SDG Targets 3.3 (end epidemics) and 15.5 (biodiversity conservation).**

National One Health Mission: Pillars

• **Technology-Enabled Surveillance**: Syndromic tracking of multi-sectoral disease indicators.
• **Biosafety Level (BSL)-3 Labs**: National network for pathogens with zoonotic potential.
• **Integrated R&D**: Vaccine and diagnostic innovation benefiting human, livestock, and wildlife health.
• **Capacity Building**: Training epidemiologists for grassroot deployment and sensitizing veterinary/public health officials.

Evidence and Data

The First State/UT Engagement Workshop provided a concrete platform to evaluate disparities and opportunities across states. Key highlights signal the evolving national preparedness for public health threats.

Key Workshop Outcomes

• Syndromic Surveillance & Vishanu Yuddh Abhyaas: Gujarat piloted simulation drills for coordinating disease control efforts. Kerala showcased cross-departmental linking of One Health institutions.
• Youth Engagement: Hackathons and campaigns launched to leverage innovation, ensuring grassroots participation.
• One Health Dashboard: Centrally mapped indicators to visually track sector-wide initiatives.

Comparing India's Approach with the Netherlands

Parameter	India (National One Health Mission)	Netherlands (One Health Action Plan)
Surveillance Scope	Human, livestock, environment-linked zoonoses	External ecosystem risk factors, including intercontinental pathogen flow
Laboratory Network	13 BSL-3 labs in progress	Operates Europe-Integrated BSL-4 network
Policy Focus	Capacity-building for zoonotic hotspots	Focused on regulatory AMR resistance measures

Key Challenges in Operationalizing One Health

The journey toward institutionalizing One Health in India faces systemic bottlenecks, reflecting weaknesses in coordination, capacity, and governance.

Operational Gaps

• Intersectoral Fragmentation: Institutional silos between human, animal health, and environmental governance continue despite policy convergence initiatives.
• Workforce Inadequacies: Acute scarcity of skilled epidemiologists, veterinary health specialists, and environmental data specialists.
• Technology Gaps: States like Bihar and Odisha lag in setting up **BSL-3 labs**; digital surveillance frameworks lack scalability.
• Data Sharing Risks: Concerns about violation of data guidelines and linking state-to-central dashboards restrict seamless collaborations.

Limitations and Open Questions

While the National One Health Mission is commendable, it raises unresolved debates that require deeper scrutiny.

Limitations

• Absence of granular data inputs from grassroots stakeholders and tribal/forest areas.
• Insufficient capital allocation in fiscal budgets—a majority of funding has gone to higher-tier governance centers rather than community-level interventions.
• Lack of frameworks or penalties for non-adherence to institutionalized One Health protocols.

Open Questions for Future Analysis

• To what extent can India's decentralized planning overcome inter-state coordination challenges?
• What role can private stakeholders or PPP models play in urban zoonotic surveillance?
• What is the feasibility of universalizing One Health Dashboards to all socio-economic strata?

Structured Assessment

• Policy Design: Effective integration of animal, public health, and environment-focused verticals, but high reliance on centralized dashboards may lead to uneven state implementation.
• Governance Capacity: States like Gujarat are promising, but non-performing states lag in preparedness for health crises.
• Behavioural/Structural Gaps: Lack of public awareness campaigns targeting rural regions hinders buy-in from local administrative levels.

Exam Integration

Practice Questions for UPSC

Prelims Practice Questions

Frequently Asked Questions