Brief Context
Context The Chairperson of the Select Committee of Lok Sabha presented the Report on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025 to the Lower House. Recommendations of Select Committee The Committee has proposed fixing a three-month time limit for the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to decide insolvency appeals. The definition of the term ‘service provider’ be suitably modified to include ‘registered valuer’ to the list of entities that are provided under the IBC, a
Source Content
Syllabus: GS2/ Governance; GS3/ Economy
Context
- The Chairperson of the Select Committee of Lok Sabha presented the Report on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025 to the Lower House.
Recommendations of Select Committee
- The Committee has proposed fixing a three-month time limit for the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to decide insolvency appeals.
- The definition of the term ‘service provider’ be suitably modified to include ‘registered valuer’ to the list of entities that are provided under the IBC, and the definition for ‘registered valuer’ be suitably inserted.
- It also suggested that to maintain coherence, appropriate references to ‘registered valuer’ be included where the term service provider is used in the Amendment Bill and at all relevant places where it has a consequential effect.
- On the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP), the committee proposed widening the definition of a resolution plan to allow more than one resolution plan for a corporate debtor undergoing CIRP.
Key Provisions of the Bill
- Mandatory Admission of CIRP: The bill mandates that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) must admit an insolvency application within 14 days if the default is proven and the application is complete, removing judicial discretion on this timeline.
- Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process (CIIRP): A new, largely out-of-court process for specific financial creditors has been introduced.
- In this process, management remains with the debtor under the oversight of a Resolution Professional (RP), with a goal of completion within 150 days.
- Enhanced Role for Committee of Creditors (CoC) in Liquidation: The CoC is empowered to supervise the liquidation process and appoint or replace the liquidator, shifting control away from a solely NCLT-appointed liquidator.
- Streamlined Withdrawals: Withdrawal of an insolvency application is only permitted after the CoC is formed and before the first invitation for resolution plans, requiring 90% CoC approval to prevent tactical delays.
| Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016 – IBC was introduced in 2016 to address rising Non Performing Assets and ineffective debt recovery mechanisms in India. |
Source: AIR
Related LearnPro Resources
To revise Select Committee Report on IBC Amendment Bill 2025 in a complete UPSC/JPSC/BPSC preparation flow, use these connected LearnPro resources:
- Daily Current Affairs - follow related daily current affairs updates.
- Daily Editorial - connect this issue with editorial analysis.
- Mains Answer Writing - practice answer writing around this theme.
- PYQ Papers - compare the topic with previous-year questions.
- UPSC Notes - revise the static syllabus background.
Select Committee Report on IBC Amendment Bill 2025 FAQs
What is the main issue in Select Committee Report on IBC Amendment Bill 2025?
Select Committee Report on IBC Amendment Bill 2025 should be understood through its immediate context, legal or policy background, responsible institutions and practical impact on governance. The topic is useful for General Studies because it links a current development with wider administrative and constitutional questions.
Why is Select Committee Report on IBC Amendment Bill 2025 important for UPSC, JPSC and BPSC?
It can help aspirants prepare factual points for Prelims and analytical points for Mains. The issue can be linked with governance, rights, public policy, institutional accountability and state-level implementation depending on the exact syllabus area.
How should aspirants revise this topic?
First revise the facts and institutions mentioned in the article. Then connect the topic with the relevant syllabus heading, prepare 3-4 mains arguments, note one example for answer writing and compare it with related previous-year questions.
What should be avoided while writing an answer on this topic?
Avoid writing only a news summary. A good answer should explain background, causes, implications, challenges, institutional roles and a balanced way forward. Unsupported data and vague generic lines should also be avoided.
How can this topic be linked with state PCS preparation?
State PCS answers can use this topic by adding local governance, district administration, implementation capacity and citizen-service delivery angles, especially for Jharkhand, Bihar and other state-specific examples.
Speak with LearnPro counselling for batch date, mode, syllabus coverage and preparation support.