Announcements
UPSC Foundation 2026 Prime Batch - Admissions Open JPSC 14th CCE Complete Course 2025 - Enroll Now Mains Answer Writing Programme - Limited Seats Daily Current Affairs - Free Access UPSC Prelims Test Series 2026 - 5000+ MCQs
+91 91025 57680
learnpro Civil Services
LearnPro Menu
Home Current Affairs All Articles
UPSC
UPSC NOTES
STATE PSC
OPTIONAL SUBJECTS
CURRENT AFFAIRS
DAILY EDITORIAL
COURSES
DOWNLOAD NOTES
PYQ Papers Mains Answer Writing WhatsApp Counselling Call +91 91025 57680 Online Courses

CA Topic

How is the Shipping Industry Tackling Emissions?

Brief Context

Context At the 83rd session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC-83) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a landmark vote was held to adopt a Market-Based Measure (MBM) for decarbonising international shipping. MEPC-83 Proposals for emissions levy mechanisms The International Chamber of Shipping advocated for a fixed levy per every tonne of CO₂ emitted. China proposed a market-driven approach where ships could trade compliance units and invest in alternative fuels.

Source Content

Syllabus: GS3/ Economy, GS3/ Environment

Context

  • At the 83rd session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC-83) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a landmark vote was held to adopt a Market-Based Measure (MBM) for decarbonising international shipping.

What is Green Shipping?

  • Green shipping refers to environmentally sustainable practices and technologies used in the maritime industry to reduce the environmental impact of shipping activities.
  • It includes cutting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, improving energy efficiency, and minimizing marine pollution.

Need for Green Shipping

  • Global Emissions: The shipping industry emits around 1 billion tonnes of GHG annually, accounting for about 2.8% of global emissions
  • Future Projections: Emissions may increase by 50–250% by 2050 if unchecked.
  • Measures Already Enforced:
    • Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI): Sets efficiency standards for new ships.
    • Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP): Operational plans to cut emissions.
    • Mandatory fuel oil consumption reporting: Improves accountability and transparency.

MEPC-83 Proposals for emissions levy mechanisms

  • The International Chamber of Shipping advocated for a fixed levy per every tonne of CO₂ emitted.
  • China proposed a market-driven approach where ships could trade compliance units and invest in alternative fuels.
  • The European Union suggested a fixed Greenhouse Gas (GHG) levy, managed by an IMO-administered fund.
  • India proposed a ‘bridging mechanism’, which would target only under-compliant ships to bear the financial burden, while rewarding those using Zero or Near-Zero (ZNZ) fuels.
  • Singapore proposed a hybrid model based on India’s proposal, including a GHG Fuel Standard (GFS) and a tiered system rewarding surplus emission units and requiring the purchase of remedial units for underperformance.

What was decided?

  • IMO adopted Singapore’s hybrid model, influenced significantly by India’s proposal, as its Net Zero Framework.
  • This marks the first time a global industry has adopted a mandatory emissions levy. However, the decision of the MEPC-83 is not final yet.

Roadblocks in implementations

  • The MEPC-83’s decision, having approved the Net Zero Framework, needs to amend Annex VI of the MARPOL convention, which governs air pollution from ships.
    • The amendment will undergo a six-month circulation period among all contracting parties to MARPOL. 
  • For final adoption, it requires a two-thirds majority of votes from members present and voting; this means that if all 101 parties participate, at least 67 must support the measure. 
  • There should be no formal objection by one-third of the parties accounting for 50% of global shipping tonnage.

What are the Concerns?

  • Oil-exporting countries, led by Saudi Arabia, opposed any significant transition to green fuels, prioritising the protection of their fossil fuel markets.
    • China and large shipping nations favoured low levies to maintain trade competitiveness.
    • Scandinavian countries demanded credit for early green efforts.
  • The original ‘Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities’ (CBDR-RC) principle is eroding.
    • Developed countries are pushing for uniform rules, disregarding historical emissions and economic capacities of developing nations.

Impact on India

  • Short-Term Impact: India’s international fleet ( around 135 ships) would incur an additional $108 million/year in fuel costs by 2030 — manageable given the scale.
  • Long-Term Opportunities:
    • India is investing heavily via the National Hydrogen Mission.
    • Indian ports are developing green hydrogen bunkering capabilities.
    • Indian hydrogen already meets the IMO’s fuel reward thresholds, aiding its export potential.

Concluding remarks

  • The MEPC-83’s approval of a market-based emissions framework represents a significant milestone in global efforts to decarbonise the shipping industry.
  • If successful, this could serve as a model for other sectors in achieving a low-carbon global economy.

Source: TH

Call WhatsApp Join Batch Download Syllabus