Announcements
UPSC Foundation 2026 Prime Batch - Admissions Open JPSC 14th CCE Complete Course 2025 - Enroll Now Mains Answer Writing Programme - Limited Seats Daily Current Affairs - Free Access UPSC Prelims Test Series 2026 - 5000+ MCQs
+91 91025 57680
learnpro Civil Services
LearnPro Menu
Home Current Affairs All Articles
UPSC
UPSC NOTES
STATE PSC
OPTIONAL SUBJECTS
CURRENT AFFAIRS
DAILY EDITORIAL
COURSES
DOWNLOAD NOTES
PYQ Papers Mains Answer Writing WhatsApp Counselling Call +91 91025 57680 Online Courses

Editorial Topic

India and the Rising Global Pesticide Toxicity

Brief Context

Published on: 24 February, 2026 A recent Science journal study quantifies Indias high contribution to global pesticide risks via Total Applied Toxicity (TAT), urging reforms amid stalled UN biodiversity goals.

Source Content

Syllabus: GS3/Environment & Biodiversity; Agriculture

Context

  • A recent Science journal study quantifies India’s high contribution to global pesticide risks via Total Applied Toxicity (TAT), urging reforms amid stalled UN biodiversity goals.
    • Also, the study indicates that the world is not on track to meet the target of reducing pesticide risk by 50% by 2030 at United Nations Biodiversity Conference (COP15), 2022.

TAT Key Findings

  • India joins China, Brazil, and the US in driving 70% of global TAT, mainly from fruits, vegetables, rice, maize, and soy crops.
  • Toxicity rose sharply in India, sub-Saharan Africa, and the Indian subcontinent, harming terrestrial arthropods, soil organisms, fish, and aquatic plants most. 
  • Only Chile nears the UN’s 50% risk reduction by 2030 (Kunming-Montreal Framework, 2022); global progress lags.

What is Total Applied Toxicity (TAT)?

  • Total Applied Toxicity (TAT) is a scientific metric used to measure the overall toxic pressure exerted by pesticides on the environment.
  • It measures the quantity of pesticides used and their intrinsic toxicity and lethality to non-target species, unlike traditional measures that focus only on the quantity (volume) of pesticides applied.
  • The rise in TAT undermines biodiversity conservation, agroecology, ecosystem services, and long-term agricultural sustainability, impacting pollinators, soil organisms, fish & aquatic life, terrestrial arthropods, and plants.
  • Thus, TAT reflects not just ‘how much’ pesticide is used, but ‘how harmful’ that use actually is.

Impacts of High Total Applied Toxicity (TAT) on India

  • Impact on Biodiversity: Decline in pollinators, as India’s horticulture sector (fruits, vegetables, oilseeds) depends heavily on pollination;
    • Loss of Terrestrial Arthropods: Their decline affects birds, reptiles, and small mammals.
    • Soil Biodiversity Degradation: Reduced soil fertility and natural nutrient cycling.
    • Aquatic Ecosystem Damage: Pesticide runoff during monsoons contaminates rivers and ponds. Impacts rural livelihoods dependent on fisheries.
  • On Agricultural: Pest resistance, reduced long-term productivity, and threat to sustainable agriculture.
  • On Public Health: Acute poisoning, chronic health effects like cancer, neurological disorders, and endocrine disruption; and occupational hazards.
  • On Economy: Rising healthcare costs, and impact on fisheries and allied sectors.
    • Export Rejections: EU rejection of Indian basmati rice due to banned fungicide residues. Stricter Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) in developed countries.

India’s Legal Framework: Is It Outdated?

  • The Insecticides Act, 1968: It focused mainly on agricultural use, having limited provisions for domestic and industrial pesticide exposure. It does not adequately address modern toxicity levels, environmental persistence, and liability mechanisms.
    • India reportedly uses 66 pesticides banned in other countries, including paraquat (banned in Europe).
  • Pesticides Management Bill, 2025: It aims to reduce risks to people and environment, and promote biological and traditional pesticides.
    • However, it lacks expert consultation, and weak liability provisions.

Environmental Governance Challenges

  • Pressure on Regulatory Framework: The Insecticides Act, 1968 is outdated. Weak enforcement and monitoring mechanisms.
  • Difficulty in Meeting International Commitments: India is a signatory to Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
    • Rising TAT makes it difficult to meet the 2030 pesticide risk reduction target.
  • Environmental Justice Concerns: Smallholders face rising input costs, health risks, and debt burdens.
    • Rural and tribal communities near biodiversity hotspots are disproportionately affected.
  • Threat to Biodiversity Hotspots: India hosts Western Ghats, Himalayas, and Indo-Burma region. High pesticide toxicity in these regions endangers endemic species, and weakens ecological resilience.
  • Global Commitments and Monitoring Gaps: The UN Biodiversity Framework requires regular reporting of annual pesticide use, data broken down by active ingredient, and real-time monitoring of progress.
    • However, many countries lack robust data systems, undermining transparency and accountability.

Way Forward

  • Policy Measures: Shift to less-toxic alternatives like Integrated Pest Management (IPM), and biological control methods.
  • Promote Organic and Natural Farming: Scaling up initiatives like Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana (PKVY), and Natural farming models.
  • Legal Reforms: Update regulatory framework, incorporate strict liability and compensation, and ban highly hazardous pesticides.
  • Data Transparency: Mandatory annual reporting, and public disclosure of pesticide residues.
  • Farmer Support: Incentivize sustainable agriculture, reduce chemical input dependency, and link to climate-resilient agriculture.

Outcomes of United Nations Biodiversity Conference (COP15), 2022

  • Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KM-GBF): It serves as the biodiversity equivalent of the Paris Agreement (climate).
  • Time Horizon: 2022–2030 (with vision for 2050).
  • Core Goals of the GBF:
    • Long-Term Goals for 2050: Protect and Restore Biodiversity; Sustainably Use Biodiversity; Equitable Sharing of Genetic Resources; Close the Biodiversity Finance Gap.
    • 30×30 Target (Flagship Commitment): Protect at least 30% of the world’s land and oceans by 2030.
    • 23 Action-Oriented Targets for 2030: It includes pesticide risk reduction (50% by 2030), directly linked to Total Applied Toxicity (TAT);
      • Restore at least 30% of degraded ecosystems;
      • Reduce introduction and establishment by 50%
      • Reduce excess nutrients and plastic pollution
      • Identify and phase out $500 billion/year in harmful subsidies (e.g., fossil fuels, unsustainable agriculture)

Biodiversity Finance Commitments

  • Financial Mobilization: $200 billion per year globally by 2030;
    • $20 billion/year from developed to developing countries by 2025;
    • $30 billion/year by 2030;
  • Creation of Global Biodiversity Framework Fund (GBFF) under the Global Environment Facility (GEF).

Digital Sequence Information (DSI)

  • Agreement on sharing benefits from Digital Sequence Information on genetic resources;
    • Important for pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, agriculture;
    • Ensures fairness to biodiversity-rich developing countries like India

Monitoring and Reporting

  • Countries need to develop National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs), align national targets with GBF, and provide periodic progress reports.
Daily Mains Practice Question
[Q] Examine the ecological, public health, and regulatory challenges posed by increasing pesticide toxicity in India.

Source: TH

Call WhatsApp Join Batch Download Syllabus