UPSC Foundation 2026 and JPSC Mentorship admissions open Daily Current Affairs
learnpro Civil Services
LearnPro Menu
Home Current Affairs All Articles
UPSC
UPSC NOTES
STATE PSC
OPTIONAL SUBJECTS
CURRENT AFFAIRS
DAILY EDITORIAL
COURSES
DOWNLOAD NOTES
PYQ Papers Mains Answer Writing Online Courses

CA Topic

Corruption in the Governance of Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY)

Brief Context

In News The Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE) recently blacklisted 178 Training Partners (TPs) and Training Centres (TCs) for large-scale irregularities under the Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY). About PMKVY Launched: 2015 under the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE). Implementing Agency: National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC).

Source Content

Syllabus: GS2/Governance; GS4/ Ethics 

In News

  • The Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE) recently blacklisted 178 Training Partners (TPs) and Training Centres (TCs) for large-scale irregularities under the Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY).
    • The issues included fake documentation, absentee students, inflated bills, and non-existent centres.

About PMKVY

  • Launched: 2015 under the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE).
  • Implementing Agency: National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC).
  • Objective: To provide skill training and certification to youth to enhance employability.
  • Beneficiaries (till June 2025): Over 1.64 crore youth trained.
  • Budget (FY 2024–25): ₹1,538 crore.
  • Latest Phase: PMKVY 4.0 (2022–2026) – focuses on industry-linked courses, digital monitoring, and local-level skill hubs.

Example

  • Similar corruption patterns were seen earlier in Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan ghost schools and MGNREGA fake job cards — showing a broader structural problem in scheme governance.

Governance and Ethical/Administrative Concern

  • Integrity & Accountability: Public funds meant for youth empowerment were diverted for private gain, breaching fiduciary trust.
  • Transparency: Denial of information under RTI citing “confidentiality” reflects opacity in public administration.
  • Public Interest vs Private Profit: The PPP model turned exploitative without adequate checks, violating the principle of public service orientation.
  • Professional Ethics: Officials and partners ignored due diligence, honesty, and fairness—core civil service values.
  • Justice and Equity: Genuine trainees were deprived of opportunities due to diversion of resources to fake beneficiaries.
  • Moral Hazard: Weak punishment mechanisms encouraged repetition of misconduct.

Implications

  • Economic: Wastage of taxpayer money; failure to bridge India’s skill gap.
  • Social: Erosion of trust among youth and employers in government certifications.
  • Administrative: Freeze on training activities in several districts; disruption of employment pipeline.
  • Reputational: Weakens India’s Skill India Mission and undermines the Viksit Bharat 2047 vision.

Way Forward

  • Strengthening Monitoring and Evaluation: 
    • Introduce Aadhaar-based biometric attendance and geo-tagging of trainees.
    • Third-party audits of TCs by independent agencies like CAG-empanelled firms.
  • Reforming the NSDC Governance Structure:
    • Separate implementation and regulation wings to avoid conflict of interest.
    • Ensure parliamentary oversight and annual performance audits.
  • Promoting Transparency: 
    • Make public disclosure of blacklisted entities, inspection reports, and fund recovery status.
    • Strengthen RTI compliance and digital dashboards.
  • Linking Funds to Outcomes:
    • Adopt an Outcome-Based Funding Model – release payments only after verified placement and skill certification.

Source: TH