Brief Context
Context Recently, the Union Defence Minister emphasized that India’s fight against terrorism is now part of its National Defence Doctrine, reinforcing its commitment to eliminating hybrid and proxy threats. Understanding Proxy Warfare: Indirect Conflict Through Third Parties Proxy warfare involves state or non-state actors supporting armed groups or insurgencies to achieve strategic objectives without direct involvement. India has consistently faced cross-border terrorism, with Pakistan-backed g
Source Content
Syllabus: GS3/Security
Context
- Recently, the Union Defence Minister emphasized that India’s fight against terrorism is now part of its National Defence Doctrine, reinforcing its commitment to eliminating hybrid and proxy threats.
Understanding Hybrid Warfare
- It is designed to destabilize adversaries without direct military confrontation. It involves a mix of kinetic (traditional military operations) and non-kinetic (extends beyond usual military operations) tactics, including:
- Cyber warfare: Attacks on critical infrastructure, financial systems, and government networks.
- Disinformation campaigns: Manipulating public perception through fake news and propaganda.
- Economic coercion: Trade restrictions, sanctions, and financial manipulation.
- Proxy conflicts: Supporting insurgent groups or non-state actors to destabilize adversaries.
- The Russia-Ukraine conflict is a prime example, where cyberattacks, drone warfare, and economic sanctions have played a crucial role.
Understanding Proxy Warfare: Indirect Conflict Through Third Parties
- Proxy warfare involves state or non-state actors supporting armed groups or insurgencies to achieve strategic objectives without direct involvement.
- India has consistently faced cross-border terrorism, with Pakistan-backed groups engaging in proxy conflicts.
- Pakistan’s Proxy War Against India:
- Cross-Border Terrorism targeting Indian security forces and civilians.
- Drug and Weapon Smuggling into Punjab, aiming to create internal disturbances.
India’s Response to Hybrid & Proxy Warfare
| Key Insights on India’s Hybrid Warfare Strategy | ||
| Aspect | Current Threats | Preparedness Measures |
| Cyber Warfare | State-sponsored attacks (e.g., Chinese malware, Pegasus) | CERT-In, Defence Cyber Agency, Cyber Security Policy |
| Information Warfare | Fake news, disinfo campaigns, deep fakes | PIB fact-check unit, Draft Digital India Bill (2023) |
| Terrorism / Proxy Warfare | Cross-border terrorism, insurgent funding | NIA, UAPA strengthening, FATF compliance |
| Military Doctrine | Gray zone ops, maritime salami slicing | Theatre commands, tri-service exercises, DSA |
| Legal/Institutional Gaps | No unified hybrid warfare law or body | Need for national hybrid warfare policy |
- Strengthening Cyber Defenses: Enhancing cybersecurity infrastructure to prevent cyber espionage and attacks.
- Military Modernization: Investing and Strengthening cyber defenses, AI-based warfare, electromagnetic warfare, and space-based security.
- Institutional Reforms: Like Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), Integrated Battle Groups (IBGs) and Military Theaterisation etc.
- Intelligence Agencies: Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), Intelligence Bureau (IB), and National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO).
- Strategic Partnerships: Collaborating with global allies to counter misinformation and economic coercion.
- Example: Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD)